Bottom

homepage

Star Wars Beam Weapon

Dirt

Billiard Balls

Press Release

DQA-NIST

Whistleblower Information

Scientific Method

Why Indeed

FAQ

Disinfo

CriticsCorner

	Critics Corner "Common sense: If Dr. Wood didn't have anything credible to say, why would folks be attacking her so vehemently?" (last updated July 13, 2007)

Click on pictures to enlarge

(Also see the misinfo page.)
(Also see the disinfo page.)


How to recognize an OP/troll
July 20, 2007, by Dr. Judy Wood

I. Articles Addressing Various Issues Top How to recognize an OP/troll July 20, 2007, by Dr. Judy Wood Inspiring 911 Forum Posts April - July, 2008, by http://forum.911movement.org/ 9/11, Exotic Tech and Hutchison Effect 10 July 2008, comments from torrent site Thinking About 9-11, the Truth, and the Official Movement 26 June 2008, by Cathy Garger, (original: axisoflogic) One Dozen Ways to Spot a Spook At Your Next 9/11 "Movement" Gathering 25 May 2008 by Cathy Garger Nice Guy Kevin Barrett Spins 9/11 Planes: A Peer Review 5 September 2007, by Morgan Reynolds and Judy Wood Acting like a Grown-up July 23, 2007, by Steven Jones, Ace Baker, Morgan Reynolds Thoroughly Discredited August 14, 2007, by Jeff Strahl Greg Jenkins Panics: A Segment from the highly-funded Jenkins psyops July 2, 2007 Hit Pieces in the J.O.N.E.S. -- Both direct and indirect July 2, 2007 Transcript of "Micronukes vs Thermite/Thermate at WTC" Transcript by Andrew Johnson, Footnotes mainly by Andrew Johnson, with additional comments by Prof Judy Wood. June 27, 2007 Reading Between The Lines -- Jenkins/Wood interview revisited, Text, Subtext and The Truth About DEWs 10 April 2007, transcript by Andrew Lowe Watson, with added pictures & comments Responses to the Greg Jenkins Attack Pieces March 6, 2007, by bloggers Email from Steven E. Jones to Greg Jenkins, recruiting Jenkins hit piece. February 2, 2007 Steven Jones' Contributions to Science, Humanity and the Planet January 29, 2007, by CB_Brooklyn

II. Brief Rebuttals Top Vaporizing the World Trade Center by Steven Dutch, last updated July 13, 2007 "His logic is circular and his information understates DEW capabilities by several orders of magnitude." Discrediting By Association: Undermining the Case for Patriots Who Question 9/11 by Victoria Ashley, Version 1.1, August 5, 2007 Congratulations to Ms. Ashley for publishing an article in her area of expertise, an area in which she appears to thrive. Victoria Ashley does not have a degree in structural engineering, engineering mechanics (applied physics), materials engineering science, nor any other type of engineering degree. For that matter, she doesn't have a degree in any area of physical science. List of Architects Who Have Questioned The Official Story of the Three WTC Collapses Victoria Ashley (BA Architecture, MA Psychology) Victoria Ashley, Psychology Researcher, BArch, Alameda, CA So, what qualifies her to write such a piece? Her expertise is in PsyOps. Her MA (2004?) is in psychology and her area of expertise is neuro-linguistic programming. How interesting. She's actually one of the most qualified to write such a PsyOps hit piece. ;-) Thoroughly Discredited August 14, 2007, by Jeff Strahl Direct Evidence for Explosions: Flying Projectiles and Widespread Impact Damage August 6, 2007, Dr. Crockett Grabbe Blog comments on the above article by Dr. Grabbe August 6, 2007, JREF forum [empasis added] "...The paper makes the assertion that certain photographs of the WTC collapse prove that explosions were responsible for the ejection of debris, but advances no evidence for the assertion. Pictures of damaged cars are produced more to refute the beam weapon theory than to promote the explosives theory; the damage is characterised as due to hot and possibly corrosive debris, but no evidence is advanced that this debris was not ejected as a result of glancing collisions in the collapse of the towers, or that the heating of the debris was not a result of the extensive pre-collapse fires. In discussion of the "squibs", the key assertion that "overpressure is created by explosions" is not justified. The discussion of the radial distribution of debris is superfluous, as the ejection velocity has already been deduced from videos, and the comment that "it is likely that explosions are also occurring after the growing dust cloud envelopes the area" is pure speculation unsupported by evidence. In summary, this paper is an attempt at proof by assertion, and no evidence is advanced to support its central thesis. .... Refused for publication. Re-submission is not advised. Dave" The World Trade Center Collapse: Waiting for a Fuse (source 2), by Crockett Grabbe, September 22, 2001, (Revised: September 25, 2001). Grabbe, Crockett L. Space Weapons and the Strategic Defense Initiative. Ames, Iowa State University Press, 1991. 252 p.Book call no.: 358.80973 G727s

III. "Peer-Reviewed" Articles Addressing Various Issues Top Want a new investigation? Want accountability? Well, today's your lucky day. 16 May 2008, by Andrew Johnson 9/11 Truth Seekers and Campaigners... "It's Your Lucky Day!" 16 May 2008, by Andrew Johnson Thinking About 9-11, the Truth, and the Official Movement 26 June 2008, by Cathy Garger, (original: axisoflogic) A physicist critiques Steven Jones' new paper 21 May 2007, by Stephen Phillips, Ph.D. Reading Between The Lines -- Jenkins/Wood interview revisited, Text, Subtext and The Truth About DEWs 10 April 2007, transcript by Andrew Lowe Watson, with added pictures & comments Dr. Greg Jenkins' "Directed Debunking Energy" and Prof. Judy Wood 1 March 2007, by Andrew Johnson The New “9/11 Hijackers”? February 2007, by Andrew Johnson Why Indeed Must it be Controlled Demolition? An informal critique of Dr. Jones' hypothesis 30 January 2007, "Who" The Scientific Method Applied to the Thermite Hypothesis 14 December 2006, Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Disintegrate? 23 Aug 2006, janedoe0911, Morgan Reynolds and Judy Wood Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Disintegrate 23 Aug 2006, nomoregames.net, Morgan Reynolds and Judy Wood, v. 1.0

IV. Comments from Various Blogs. Top "Common sense: If Dr. Wood didn't have anything credible to say, why would folks be attacking her so vehemently?" ChemBlog (Japanese?) Contrail or Chemtrail, I never mind. They're always above us apparently and certainly. The Very Strange Circumstances of the Greg Jenkins Interview with Judy Wood Tuesday, March 06, 2007 http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2007/02/dustification.html Sunday, February 18, 2007 WTC1 dustification 0:17 URL posted by Spooked911, to spooked911,  February 18, 2007 http://raftshol.blogspot.com/ Saturday, May 12, 2007

V. Comments Top From Forums: Two Great Posts by "underscribed" August 30, 2007 Supporting Evidence for No-Planes and DEW (exotic weapons) August 30, 2007 Email and Other Comments: Group1 (last updated August 30, 2007) Group2 (last updated September 00, 2007)

(Also see the misinfo page.)
(Also see the disinfo page.)

Top

homepage

Star Wars Beam Weapon

Dirt

Billiard Balls

Press Release

DQA-NIST

Whistleblower Information

Scientific Method

Why Indeed

FAQ

Disinfo

CriticsCorner

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles posted on this webpage are distributed for their included information without profit for research and/or educational purposes only. This webpage has no affiliation whatsoever with the original sources of the articles nor are we sponsored or endorsed by any of the original sources. © 2006-2007 Judy Wood and the author above. All rights reserved.